July 2004 NACBHDD Newsletter
The Newsletter of the National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors
In this Issue...
Ninth Annual Conference: Developing New Leaders for the Future
Ritz Carlton, Phoenix, Arizona, July 15-17
Don’t Miss This Opportunity!
NACBHD’s New Leaders for the Future Conference promises to provide participants with knowledge, skills and tools that can be readily used in their
communities. Highlights and opportunities are described below:
-
Special Leadership Seminar: Limited Seating!
Special Leadership Session, “Leading the Transformation of Behavioral Health Delivery Systems” will show participants how to create a “revolution”
instead of piecemeal approaches to change.
-
NIMH and SAMHSA—Evidence-based practices—Information Dissemination & and Impacts on Block Grant and other Funding Allocations
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Agency (SAMHSA) will showcase their newest on-line
products. These free products are designed to make it easier for communities to disseminate information on evidence-based practices. This information
dissemination is a first step towards generating leadership necessary for successful implementation. SAMHSA will also report on how evidence-based
practices impacts block grant and other funding allocations.
-
The National Association of Public Hospitals will present information on Intergovernmental Transfers—how they operate and why they are important to county
governments. Participants will be provided with strategies for addressing impacts of changes to IGT’s. Other finance issues to be analyzed include HCBW
and Medicaid.
-
Improving Access to Child Psychiatric Service—Medications and Management
Child psychiatrists will report on medications and how these can be managed at the community level. Child psychiatrists will also describe effective
programs for assisting youth with sex offending and other severely challenging behaviors. This will specifically address children with mental health
and developmental disabilities.
-
County Data—Consumer Access to Services Information & A Chemical Dependency Report Card
County government experts (those working in and for counties) will describe how to use available data to improve outcomes for individuals and families
as well as for providers and government. Participants will learn about a community database that improves consumer access to services information and
how to develop a chemical dependency “report card” used to improve services in the community.
-
And much more…
Register online now!
NACBHD Attends the Annual Conference of the National Association of State Drug and Alcohol Directors (NASADAD) & the National Prevention Network (NPN)
For the first time in the association’s history, NACBHD attended the Annual Conference of NASADAD and NPN. NACBHD attended this meeting to publicly express
our willingness to partner with the state and federal governments in the provision, planning and oversight of addiction services. NACBHD also attended this
meeting as a way to provide staff with a better understand the treatment and prevention sectors. A better understanding will result improved effectiveness
efforts to advocate for counties in both treatment and prevention. NACBHD made its attendance known and eagerness to partner to all participants during an
open microphone session.
Several themes that were highlighted by NASADAD, NPN and SAMHSA during this conference included:
-
Transforming to a Performance Partnership Grant (PPG). SAMHSA administrator Charles Curie informed participants that SAMHSA will shift its
immediate focus from PPG implementation to data and the development of national performance standards. To support this effort, SAMHSA has created
an internal data strategy workgroup. Once standards have been agreed to and methods for collections are in place, SAMHSA will again move in the
direction of performance based contracting (PPGs).
NASADAD strongly encourages SAMHSA to provide data and infrastructure resources and added program flexibility to the SAPT block grant.
-
Maintenance of Effort. Several states expressed a difficulty in either meeting the MOE requirements (due to fiscal conditions in the states) or
in explaining to SAMHSA how MOE has been achieved. This is a critical issue for states as SAMHSA will be cutting funding based upon MOE requirements.
Treatment and Prevention. States expressed to SAMHSA a need for the federal government to help craft a way to protect prevention resources from
being absorbed by treatment (e.g. 20% threshold). Participants and presenters often referred to the need to increase both treatment and prevention efforts.
If you would like more information about the conference or about NASADAD/NPN policy and advocacy positions, please contact Melissa Staats at
mstaats@nacbhd.org or (202) 661-8816.
NACBHD Provided Testimony to SAMHSA National Advisory Council
On June 30 2004, NACBHD provided both written and verbal testimony to SAMHSA’s National Advisory Council. The National Advisory Council and its
subcommittees were established to advise the “Director of the Administration or Center for which the advisory council is established concerning
matters relating to the activities carried out by and through the Administration or Center and the policies respecting such activities." NACBHD’s
testimony can be found at www.nacbhd.org/members/legislative/070504.cfm.
NACBHD and NACo Send Joint Letter to New CMS Director Regarding Medicare Modernization Act and Dual Eligibles
NACBHD and NACo recently sent a joint letter to the new CMS Administrator, Mark McClellan, regarding concerns about the new Part D benefit of the
Medicare Modernization Act and its impact on access to medications for dual eligibles. The letter outlines recommended protections to guard against
this loss of access. To view the letter, see the NACBHD website at
www.nacbhd.org/members/legislative/061504.cfm
Transformation
NACBHD to Participate in Conference on Transformational Leadership
Melissa Staats, NACBHD’s Executive Director, will participate in the Conference on Transformational Leadership, this August 8 and 9. The Center for
Mental Health Services (CMHS), as part of its Action Agenda to implement key components of the goals and recommendations of the Presidents Commission on
Mental Health (see April, June, and current newsletters), is convening “a select group of experts
who can advise us about aggressive, yet realistic strategies to effectively address the need for strong leadership” (from the invitation from Kathryn
Power, M.Ed., Director, CMHS). The purpose of the meeting is to “define a process that CMHS can implement that will create and sustain a strong leadership
and knowledge base in the mental health field.” Invitees include SAMHSA officials, officials from NASMHPD, NMHA, NAMI, the National Empowerment Center,
NCCBH, and the National Alliance of Multi-Ethnic Behavioral Health Associations. Look for a report on the meeting in the September newsletter.
Update on the Campaign for Mental Health Reform: Intense Effort Focusing on State and Local Transformation Continues
NACBHD spoke with Bill Emmet, project director at the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD), and project director for
the Campaign, about recent Campaign activities.
-
State-Informed Federal Policy Initiative
The Campaign has developed a strategy (see June newsletter) that involves gathering information on what is happening at the state and local level in terms
of transformation and finding out what the implications are for federal policy. The process, which does not have a formal name, but which Emmet refers to
as a “state-informed federal policy initiative,” is supported by a grant from the MacArthur Foundation.
The project is on schedule, with work underway on selecting four to five states involved in meaningful transformation efforts for visits in July. New
Mexico will be among the selected states because of its behavioral health purchasing collaborative, which involves working with 17 state agencies to align
funding in a way that those who need services can access them, looking at the theory of “no wrong door,” and lining up federal and state funding streams.
The Campaign will meet in early to mid July to determine the criteria for state selection and the information they would like to seek from the states.
Melissa Staats represents NACBHD at Campaign meetings, and Emmet hopes NACBHD will make sure the Campaign understands needs at the local level.
Communication with selected states will continue through the summer, with a draft of findings projected for completion by October 1, and the final
document ready by January.
The Campaign has hired a full-time writer and researcher for the initiative. Jennifer Urff, J.D., of Advocates for Human Potential in Delmar, New York,
has worked on Olmstead implementation and previously worked at NASMHPD as Director of Government Relations and Senior Policy Counsel. She will be involved
in visiting the selected states.
For information on state implementation activities related to the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, see the NASMHPD web site at
www.nasmhpd.org for the chart, “New Freedom Commission on Mental Health State Implementation
Activities.” While the Campaign’s state-informed federal policy initiative will identify and examine several states more specifically, the chart
is an important source of information for the Campaign and is a current list of implementation activities in each state.
-
Legislative Activity
A recent hearing on the Mentally Ill Offender Treatment and Crime Reduction Act in the House Judiciary Committee went very well, with hopes that the bill
will be marked up when Congress is back in session.
On July 20, there will be a hearing on performance measures and outcomes in substance abuse and mental health in the Senate Health, Education, Labor,
and Pensions (HELP) Subcommittee. Emmet notes that this is an opportunity “to look at what works and how to identify what works.” The Campaign will
identify someone who can testify on its behalf.
-
SAMHSA Reauthorization
SAMHSA reauthorization is considered a 2005 activity, with a view to the state-informed federal policy initiative as a process that will inform how
reauthorization should look.
-
SAMHSA Action Agenda
The SAMHSA Action Agenda, the “road map” for federal activity around transformation, is expected to be released soon, according to the information
Emmet heard from SAMHSA administrators at the recent NASMHPD annual meeting.
-
Some New Freedom Subcommittee Background Papers Now Available
Several background papers from the Subcommittees of the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health are now available online at
www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/subcommittee. Background papers from the
Acute Care, Criminal Justice, Homelessness/Housing, and Rural Issues Subcommittees can now be accessed. The Campaign expects to find helpful information
in these background papers.
-
Carter Symposium Follow-Up
The online survey of attendees is in process, and should yield interesting information about transformation efforts and what issues are being addressed.
The New Freedom Commission Report: A Multicultural Perspective Forum
An Interview with NACBHD Member Marvin Southard
On June 2, the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, the Latino Behavioral Health Institute, the California Mental Health Directors Association,
the California Institute of Mental Health, and the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill held the “New Freedom Commission Report: A Multicultural
Perspective Forum.” The one-day event is part of California’s overall effort to implement the Report’s recommendations and included leaders from
communities of color and Commissioner Steve Mayberg (also Director of the California Department of Mental Health) to discuss the report and possible
recommendations and policy implementation strategies from a multicultural viewpoint.
Marvin Southard, Director of the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, and NACBHD member, reports that while the event was a one-day forum, it
brought out some important issues and “spawned” other events.
Clients and families as the center and starting point of the discussion
The forum focused on the mobilization and inclusion of clients and their families as a starting point for discussion. Southard says the most important
thing that came out of the forum for him is how different the dialogue can be if clients and families have the central place in the discussion.
Representatives from NAMI and local client groups, Mayberg, and experts on multicultural services were present. Latinos, African Americans, American
Indians, Asian Pacific Islanders, and older adults were represented because they are all underserved groups in the area. Break out groups discussed
access, training of professionals, and reduction of stigma. Training issues involve finding ways for people with cultural backgrounds to enter the
mental health field and supplement undergraduate education with additional higher education.
Events following from the forum
State forums will be held throughout the summer to advance the issue of multiculturalism, which Southard says is “a topic that needs to be addressed in
every aspect of providing quality mental health care.” And, in Los Angeles specifically, there will be a multi-year initiative focusing on access for
minorities to mental health care, particularly Latinos, who are the most underserved population in Los Angeles. The reasons for this are complex, notes
Southard, but are most likely related to immigration issues and reluctance to seek care, the shortages of professionals with language and cultural skills,
and the shortage of community organizations in some areas to serve mental health needs. Similar issues arise in the American Indian and Asian Pacific
Islander populations.
-
Funding
The initiative does not involve new funding, but redirection of existing funding and seeking of support from foundations. There has been a $30 million
reduction in the mental health program in Los Angeles County. In view of this, clients and families have had a voice in what services should be
emphasized, including this initiative, with the goal of not making disparities worse than they are now.
For more information on the forum
An interim report on the forum is due by the end of June on the California Institute of Mental Health website at
www.cimh.org; the final report will be available at the same address.
An opportunity to make a practical difference
“Let’s take advantage of this opportunity to put something in place that makes a difference,” says Southard of the Final Report of the President’s
Commission on Mental Health. California’s effort to implement the report’s recommendations focuses on the report as a practical document; and Southard
views it as a means for practical implementation of things that states and counties can do. He is also involved in another effort related to the
implementation of the Report’s recommendations – the better integration of mental health and substance abuse. Look for an interview with Southard
on this effort in the August newsletter.
Developments in the California Budget Crisis: An Interview with NACBHD Member Patricia Ryan
NACBHD reported on the California state budget and Medicaid crisis in the April and February newsletters. The finalization of the budget and Medicaid
restructuring are close but still underway. NACBHD spoke with Patricia Ryan, NACBHD member and Executive Director of the California Mental Health
Directors Association, about recent developments and issues of interest to county behavioral health directors.
So far, the legislature has rejected proposed cuts for mental health, but the Governor could still line item veto in this area. The current situation
for counties is bad, regardless of the 04-05 budget proposals. When NACBHD spoke with Ryan, the budget was at the “big five level” of discussion, which
includes the leadership of the Senate and Assembly and the Governor. The Chair of the Senate Budget Committee, Darrel Steinberg, is a strong advocate
for county behavioral health. But, according to Ryan, there is a feeling of “calm before the storm,” or a feeling of “systematically dismantling” a
good system of care. Ryan reviewed the following issues in the budget crisis that impact local public mental health in California:
-
Timeline
The FY 04-05 budget was scheduled to be adopted by the legislature by June 15 and signed by the Governor by July 1, and was behind schedule when this
newsletter went to publication. The Medicaid Reform Proposal is due in August and the California Performance Review (see below for discussion of both)
will be completed sometime after the budget. Neither Medicaid Reform nor the results of the California Performance Review will be part of the FY 04-05
budget; they will effect the FY 05-06 budget.
-
Realignment Funding
In 1991, the legislature, through realignment, transferred financial responsibility for most of the state’s mental health and public health programs,
and some of the social service programs, from the state to local governments, and provided counties with a dedicated revenue source to pay for the
changes. Two tax increases – the statewide sales tax rate increase of a half-cent and the vehicle license fee – were dedicated to funding the realigned
programs. The first claim on the Sales Tax Growth Account (from the two tax increases) goes to caseload-driven social services. Because of the caseload
growth in Child Welfare Services and Foster Care and the significant and unanticipated cost increases in the In Home Services Support Program, growth
distributions to the Mental Health Subaccount and Health Subaccount have been substantially reduced. (For mental health, the realignment was transferred
to the prerealignment areas of general community mental health funding, state hospital civil commitment funding, and IMD funding.)
-
Counties in California Manage the Medicaid Program (Medi-Cal) for the Seriously Mentally Ill
Medi-Cal is the second largest revenue source for county mental health programs. Understanding the changes in California’s Mental Health Medi-Cal
program since realignment and the interaction of Medi-Cal revenues with realignment are critical to analyzing the current structure and status of
public mental health in California. There are several complex realignment/Medi-Cal issues, including: 1) Counties have not received COLA’s for
Medi-Cal since 2000 and the allocation was reduced by 5% in FY 03-04; 2) Counties must use an increasing proportion of realignment funds for the
federal Medicaid match, resulting in fewer funds for the “targeted” indigent clients; 3) Recent failure of the state to reimburse counties for the
cost of providing state mandated services to Special Education Pupils (see below) has put a strain on county realignment and other mental health
resources.
-
Mental Health Services to Special Education Pupils, AB 3632
Under the federal IDEA law, all children with disabilities are entitled to a free, appropriate public education. This includes mental health treatment.
In 1984, the California legislature transferred responsibility for providing mental health services to special education children from school districts
to county mental health departments (AB 3632). This has been handled through a mandated reimbursement from the state to counties; however, three years
ago the state issued a moratorium on the reimbursement mandate, effectively saying, “We owe you, but we can’t pay you.” This has amounted to about
$120 million per year, with this year as the third year with no funding for the federal entitlement. Some counties have no general funds to pay for
this program, which leaves them no choice but to use scarce realignment funds meant to serve their “target” low-income and uninsured populations of
seriously emotionally disturbed children and seriously mentally ill adults. One small county announced it cannot provide services without funding;
and a large county filed suit against the state for non-payment of a state mandate. The lack of funding is causing some service reductions and denials,
a violation of state and federal law. Without this county partnership, the California Department of Education may no longer be able to assure the
federal government that “related services” (including mental health services) are being provided to all eligible students, jeopardizing the $900 million
in federal IDEA funds.
-
Possible Elimination of the Children’s System of Care
The Children’s System of Care is an interagency program led by county mental health departments to ensure that high-risk youth with serious emotional
disturbances achieve optimal outcomes without duplication of effort and resources. $20 million of funding is involved for 2004-2005; the program’s
budget had already been reduced from $35.6 million to $20 million for FY 02-03. Elimination of the program would likely cause children to end up in
juvenile justice system. As Ryan says, this used to be the “glue to give kids what they need to stay out of trouble.”
-
California Performance Review
The Governor has appointed a bipartisan group of current and former state employees to examine restructuring of the state government, including the
relationship between state and local government and related funding. While the results of the performance review will not be incorporated in this year’s
budget, a major reorganization of the way the state government works is expected. Ryan says that it makes sense for dedicated funding to go to local
services and she predicts that the group will look at more of this. Rumors about outcomes of the performance review include the consolidation of some
state agencies and the elimination of others; and that the group is looking at how to eliminate barriers to doing what makes sense and what will allow
counties to do what works. While there is no one representing local mental health per se on the review group, a former interim director of the
California Mental Health Director’s Association and a former official with the state department of mental health are part of the group; and Ryan
says they understand the system and its flaws.
-
Mental Health Services Act
The Mental Health Services Act, an initiative to serve California’s most severely mentally ill by imposing a one percent tax on net income above $1
million, has made it onto the November ballot. The initiative would bring more money into counties to treat broader groups than currently mandated,
and could have a “significant, maybe even tremendous impact,” reported Cathy Geary, NACBHD member and Chair of the Medi-Cal Committee of the California
Mental Health Directors Association in the February newsletter. If passed, the initiative could raise $600 million to $1
billion a year, depending on the economy. Ryan reports that grass roots efforts to get the initiative on the ballot paid off, with more than the 500,000
signatures needed to qualify for the ballot collected; and people involved in serving the mentally ill are very enthusiastic about the initiative.
While initiatives are a controversial method of creating public policy, the legislature is viewed as so dysfunctional that something had to be done to
help mental health. For more information, see www.campaignformentalhealth.org.
Look for more on the budget situation in California and its impact on behavioral health, as well as a report on Medicaid restructuring in the state, in
the August or September newsletter.
September is National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month
September 2004 is the 15th annual National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month. SAMHSA, along with HHS, and in partnership with national planning
partner organizations, has created a user-friendly planning toolkit to help prepare for events and activities related to Recovery Month. Information
about media outreach, targeted outreach, and resources can be accessed and toolkits can be downloaded at
www.recoverymonth.gov. Hard copies can be ordered for free at 1-800-662-HELP.
Wernert Award Winner Announced
The Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc. (TAC), in collaboration with NACBHD, will present the fifth annual Thomas M. Wernert Award for Innovation
in Community Behavioral Healthcare on July 16 at the NACBHD Annual Conference in Phoenix. The $10,000 award goes to the Consumers as Providers
Program (CAP), the University of Kansas Office of Mental Health Training & Research, Supported Education in Lawrence, Kansas.
CAP is a supported education endeavor that creates greater community involvement and quality of life for consumers. Training includes classes and
internship activities in a supported academic environment for individuals with severe and persistent mental illness. Participants acquire skills
for marketability as mental health providers, self-confidence, and meaningful employment and future academic opportunities. For more information,
see the TAC website at www.tacinc.org.
New Reports from the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured
The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured (KCMU) issued two new reports of interest to county behavioral health directors in June. The U.S.
Supreme Court’s Olmstead Decision: Five Years Later and The Impact of Recent Changes in Health Care Coverage for Low-Income People: A First Look
at the Research Following Changes in Oregon’s Medicaid Program, as well as other reports of interest, can be accessed at
www.kff.org/about/kcmu.
NAMI To Launch National Walk Program
NAMIWALKS D.C. for the Mind of America, part of a nationwide pilot program sponsored by the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, is scheduled for
October 2004, to increase public awareness about mental illness and to raise money for NAMI’s support, education, advocacy, and research programs.
The first of its kind to be held in the nation’s capitol, the walk will be one of fifty walks held across the country in 2004-2005. See
www.nami.org for more information.